Zush vs Sortio: AI File Sorting and Renaming Compared (2026)
Jump to section
Quick answer: Zush and Sortio both sort files into folders from a plain-language prompt and rename them in the same pass. Zush’s optional AI folder sorting is currently in beta. Pick Zush if you sort more than documents and images (video, audio, RAW photos, design files), want exact control over filenames, or prefer a one-time $48 license with no file meter. Pick Sortio if you need Linux, shared team workspaces, or free rule-based sorting.
Last checked: October 5, 2026. Written by the maker of Zush. Sources: Sortio pricing and data flow, Mac/Windows/Linux downloads, and security and recovery documentation. This compares published features, not independently measured performance. Verify checkout prices and your processing mode.
Zush vs Sortio at a glance
| Zush | Sortio | |
|---|---|---|
| Sorting instruction | AI folder sorting (beta): plain-language Folder rules (up to 2,000 characters) or Auto | Plain-English prompt, plus classic rules |
| Renames files | Yes, with Templates and 145+ Naming Blocks | Yes on Pro, with templates |
| File types | PDFs and scans, photos incl. RAW and HEIC, screenshots, Office and iWork, design files, video, audio | Documents, images, PDFs, spreadsheets; no full format list published |
| Existing folders | Reuse existing folders, create new ones when nothing fits | Restrict to a folder list, fallback folder for unmatched files |
| Automation | Monitor with a sorting Template | Watch folders |
| Review and undo | Preview names and folders; undo restores original folder and name | Preview, undo, and history |
| Local AI | LM Studio or Ollama for analysis and folder planning | Ollama; BYOK on every plan |
| Platforms | Mac, Windows | Mac, Windows, Linux |
| Free plan | 50 AI renames | Unlimited rule-based sorting, one-time AI trial |
| Paid | $10/mo or $48 one-time, no file meter | Pro $14.99/mo or $99/yr; Team $29/seat/mo or $290/seat/yr; Enterprise from $50/seat/mo |
| Hosted processing | Managed cloud, BYOK, or local routes selected by the user | Filenames/metadata sent by default; file contents only with content features; homepage states 30-day rolling hosted retention |
| Teams | Per-user desktop licensing; no shared team admin workspace documented | Shared workspaces/automations, pooled allowance, admin seats and central LLM policy |
Where Zush is stronger
Sorting by content beyond documents. Zush looks at sampled video frames, audio, design files, and RAW photos, not just text and images. “Group videos by topic” or “Separate B-roll, interviews, and screen recordings” works on files called IMG_5501.MOV. Sortio’s published materials focus on documents, images, and spreadsheets.
Filenames you fully control. In Zush, the folder rule and the filename are separate: Folder rules decide where a file goes, and a Template built from 145+ Naming Blocks decides what it is called, including dates, vendors, amounts, capture metadata, case, separators, and language. That keeps names consistent across thousands of files.
Predictable paid app allowance. Zush PRO is $48 once or $10/month with no monthly rename cap, including Zush Cloud AI. Sortio Pro is $14.99/month or $99/year with a hosted AI allowance; BYOK is unmetered but provider charges are separate. Sortio does not publish the allowance as a fixed number of files on its current pricing page, so it cannot be equated with a measured workload. A three-year license-only scenario is $48 for Zush One-Time and $297 for Sortio Pro Annual, assuming unchanged prices and uninterrupted billing, before taxes or API costs.
Monitor remembers its folders. When Zush creates a folder for a Monitor Template, it records what belongs there, so next month’s invoice from the same supplier lands in the same place.
Private sorting end to end. With LM Studio or Ollama selected, both the file analysis and the folder planning step run on your computer, and Zush does not fall back to the cloud.
Where Sortio is stronger
Linux. Sortio runs on Linux as well as Mac and Windows. Zush is Mac and Windows only.
Free rule-based sorting. Sortio’s free plan includes unlimited classic rules (up to five), watch folders, and undo, without any AI. Zush’s free start is 50 AI renames.
Teams. Sortio’s Team plan includes shared workspaces and automations, an admin console, central LLM policy, and a pooled allowance at twice Pro per seat. Enterprise starts at $50/seat/month with volume licensing for 25+ seats and procurement support. These are substantive advantages for coordinated teams; Zush’s per-user licensing does not provide an equivalent shared admin workspace.
Folder allowlists and fallbacks. Sortio can restrict sorting to a fixed list of folders and send anything unmatched to a fallback folder. In Zush, Reuse existing folders prefers your folders but can create new ones; add “Put everything else in Other” to your rule for a catch-all.
Sortio limitations to check before buying
Hosted retention and remote metadata. Sortio’s homepage says hosted content is purged on a 30-day rolling window. By default, AI planning sends filenames and metadata; content-based features can also send file text or images. Its security page also says contents are not retained, which is less precise than that 30-day statement. For a strict no-upload requirement, select Ollama local mode and verify it. BYOK sends data to your selected provider; it is not automatically offline.
Allowance and renewal. Pro and Team are recurring subscriptions with hosted allowances. The public page gives a percentage usage indicator rather than a fixed allowance count; Pro AI sorts are listed as up to 5,000 files per run, with unlimited automation and unmetered BYOK. Confirm how your batch is counted before committing.
Backup size. Sortio keeps backups for the ten most recent sorts and skips a backup when the batch exceeds its default 500 MB cap. You can change or remove that cap; history-based undo is separate and still works. For a large media batch, check the backup setting rather than assuming a safety copy exists.
These limitations do not erase its Linux and team-workflow strengths. Zush’s own constraints are desktop-only Mac/Windows support, local-model setup, and beta status for AI folder sorting.
Same prompt in both apps
A typical instruction works in either app:
Group invoices by company and receipts by month. Name month folders YYYY-MM.
In Zush, that sentence goes into Folder rules, the Template decides the filename (for example 2026-06-12 – Acme Supply – Invoice 10234.pdf), and you review both before applying. Sortio builds a plan from the same sentence and routes the files. The difference shows up with mixed batches: add a video, a voice memo, and a Figma export, and check which app gives each one a descriptive name and a sensible folder.
Need more rules to test? Use the 30 folder sorting prompts.
Which should you choose?
- Mixed folders with video, audio, RAW, or design files: Zush.
- Strict filename conventions for invoices, receipts, or client files: Zush.
- One-time payment without a file meter: Zush.
- Linux desktop, team workspaces, or free rules without AI: Sortio.
Both have a free start. Run the same 20 files through each and compare the plans before you decide.
FAQ
Is Zush a good Sortio alternative?
Yes. Zush also sorts files into folders from a plain-language prompt and renames them in the same reviewed batch, on Mac and Windows. It adds video, audio, RAW, and design file support, 145+ Naming Blocks for filenames, and a $48 one-time license with no file meter.
Is Sortio free?
Sortio’s free plan includes unlimited rule-based sorting with up to five rules, watch folders, undo, and a one-time AI trial. AI sorting beyond the trial requires Pro at $14.99 a month or $99 a year, or your own API key.
Which one works offline?
Both. Zush runs analysis and folder planning locally with LM Studio or Ollama. Sortio supports Ollama for local AI.
Does Zush run on Linux?
No. Zush has native apps for macOS 15+ and Windows 10 and 11. If you need Linux, Sortio or the open-source AI File Sorter are the options.
